If someone calls in a report to DCYF of a child/children being sexually molested, wouldn't that warrant immediate removal? Wouldn't this be considered "Imminent Danger"?
Why would a newborn, blonde haired, blue eyed grandchild be considered to be in "Imminent Danger", but NOT the children of the accused parents?
Why would the children be left in the home, but the newborn never even allowed into the home?
How does a DCYF Lawyer get away with telling a Judge there is sexual molestation going on in a home and not mention the children were never removed. The Judge never even asked. How does she even get away with making the false statement, when she already knows it was already Proven to be a false report?
Could it be the day the report was called in that it was already Proven a False Report? Or could it be the False reporter never stated where the "supposed" abuse took place? So where did the DCYF Lawyer come up with,"It happened in the Grandparent's home", when there was no address given? No dates, no times?
Isn't "Hearsay" without proof in Family Court cases ILLEGAL?
Isn't "Slander" also ILLEGAL?
NH DCYF as well as the NH Family Court's need to get their shit together. How many more Grandparents have been and will be screwed over because of the ILLEGAL practices of both DCYF and the Family Courts?
How many more children and families will suffer the abuse of DCYF and the Family Courts?
Isabella Brooke Knightly and Austin Gamez-Knightly
In Memory of my Loving Husband, William F. Knightly Jr. Murdered by ILLEGAL Palliative Care at a Nashua, NH Hospital
No comments:
Post a Comment